Visit our COVID-19 site for latest information regarding how we can support you. For up to date information about the pandemic visit www.sacoronavirus.co.za.

bs-regular

bs-extra-light

bs-light

bs-light

bs-cond-light-webfont

bs-medium

bs-bold

bs-black

Engage and learn about markets and trading online

- The Standard Bank community
- :
- Online Share Trading
- :
- Talk
- :
- Public Archive
- :
- Re:Re:Re:Another Strategy destined to fail

Post options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

11 REPLIES 11

Super Contributor

14-10-2009 03:01 PM

interesting. so you saying if you blow 50% of your capital you must risk 4% on the next trade?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Valued Contributor

14-10-2009 09:48 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Not applicable

14-10-2009 11:06 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Valued Contributor

15-10-2009 08:16 AM

nope, read trade Your Way to Financial Freedom ..

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Frequent Contributor

15-10-2009 08:19 AM

let initial capital be "C"

then a positive trade will give C*1.02

and a genative trade will give C*0.98

A sequence of trades ... C * 1.02^p * 0.98^n

because multiplication is commutative. with p number of positive trades and n number of negative trades. And because multiplication is commutative the order with which the trades happen is not important. You make money as long as p > n. so any strategy that ensures p>n, will make money in the long run. You cannot run out of capital - I ignore small issues like trading costs.

Not scaling will take C to zero with any sequence (any) that where n-p>50. OK, given that would be a pritty crappy strategy.

PS: if you fix your growth expectation (say 15%) then that allows you to compute the p/(p+n) ratio - some say this is 0.6, that is 60% successfull trades.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

OK, I will check it out over the weekend

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Frequent Contributor

15-10-2009 08:35 AM

So the tradeoff between your suggestion and the traditional approach is that in your approach you should avoid any sequence that has n-p>50 and in the traditional scaled capital approach you should avoid any strategy with p/(n+p)<0.52. makes sense now.

Thanks, interesting post.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content