Okay so some one help me - this name links into the founding of the asset maangement business - in 1991. So what?

Is this the best thy could do- but what is in a name when it is the outcomes linked to the name that count , besides it has a  founder's ego trip ring to it?

More importantly as an INL share holder a name change or no name change at all is  going to erase the  last 5 - or perhaps longer - results of the group.

Fat, lazy  and grandmasters at  badly deployed capital - what,if anything , is this delink going to do for investors?

Not a lot I fear - unless the cozy culture changes and becomes cognizant of and responsive to the only thing that counts - share holder and client SATISFACTION.???